Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 2181 - 2200 of 3,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2013, 9:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  That’s inaccurate descriptively as a matter of the science of decisionmaking, nor is it normatively sensible. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
Thus, trying non-citizens for crimes committed while functionally intertwined with forward-deployed servicemembers in a zone of active combat operations presented the strongest case for military jurisdiction both as a matter of constitutional law and U.S. policy, leaving the harder questions about military jurisdiction over U.S. citizen civilians and/or civilians inside the United States for another day. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 1:19 pm by James Yang
Now, you might say that I’m taking it too far and not being reasonable. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm by Eric
 I'm much more interested in figuring out how we can stop suing each other. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:14 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
You can catch up on the rest of the series here: A is for Annualized Income Installment Method B is for Bad Debt Expense C is for Carpooling D is for Disaster Relief E is for Educational Assistance F is for Fellowships and Scholarships G is for Government Debt H is for Hardship Withdrawal. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
A leave-on hair cosmetic composition, comprising the following components (A), (B) and (C): (A) malic acid or a salt thereof; (B) at least one organic solvent selected from benzylacohol or 2-benzyloxyethanol; and (C) a set polymer, selected from polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer compounds, acidic vinyl ether polymer compounds, acidic polyvinyl acetate polymer compounds, acidic acrylic polymer compounds, amphoteric acrylic polymer compounds, basic acrylic polymer… [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:24 am by Dennis Crouch
Part 11 (Representation of Others Before The United States Patent and Trademark Office), if a practitioner has a conflict of interest in a given matter, arising from a different client, timely withdrawal by the practitioner from the given matter would generally result in OED not seeking discipline for conflicts of interest under Part 11. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm by Ken
Second, under Rule 11(c)(5)(B), because Prenda dismissed this particular case before Judge Wright issued his February 7, 2013 Order to Show Cause, he can't impose monetary sanctions under Rule 11 — though he can impose monetary sanctions with other tools discussed below, and can impose them in any cases in which he issued his OSC before Prenda dismissed. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 11:18 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg- She was 1st in her class at Columbia Law School in 1959 but Justice Felix Frankfurter refused to hire her as a clerk, as was the Supreme Court’s tradition, b/c she was a woman. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:07 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
You can catch up on the rest of the series here: A is for Annualized Income Installment Method B is for Bad Debt Expense C is for Carpooling D is for Disaster Relief E is for Educational Assistance F is for Fellowships and Scholarships G is for Government Debt H is for Hardship Withdrawal. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
What’s more, even if subsection (3) operates as intended, I’m not sure it interacts effectively with subsection (1). [read post]