Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 2181 - 2200 of 16,583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm by David Oscar Markus
I predict that the plaintiff's lawyer Mark Arisohn won't be getting much sleep tonight.Judge Ungaro Throws Out Bank Atlantic Verdict(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "http://www.scribd.com/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })(); [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:12 am
He also held UK registered trade marks for the words AUTOPAINT INTERNATIONAL and for a device mark which included them. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm
Here are three suggestions for doing so: Explain the law regarding spousal support entitlement – Clients may not be aware that alimony is not automatically granted, or that the reasons for the break-up don’t matter for support (i.e. it doesn’t make any difference if someone cheated), or that spousal and child support are entirely separate claims. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Applying the second test, the Court couldn’t find as a matter of law that the supposed benefits outweighed plaintiffs' injuries. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm by Dave Maass
At the core of the brief is the argument that metadata matters. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Introduction by Nomi Maya Stolzenberg and Douglas NeJaime; articles by Mark Tushnet, Ira C. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:21 am
Elsewhere, the jiplp weblog carries a Current Intelligence note from Mira T. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 8:06 pm
Courts exclude this evidence because we don’t want juries to take subsequent remedial measures as proof of guilt. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 9:37 am by Johannes Fuhrmann
In its decision of 6 June 2018 (case T-803/16), the GC decided that the BoA was not competent to rule upon the question of genuine use of its own motion in inter partes proceedings if this was not subject matter of the proceedings. [read post]
21 May 2024, 11:45 am by Robert Zulandt
[t]herefore, we find confusion unlikely” therein failing to establish priority. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 5:43 am
To quote Mark, "You will be astonished midway through. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:23 am by Geri Haight
example, the Trademark Office refused registration on the grounds that the applied-for mark “consists or includes matter which may falsely suggest a connection with the actor Charlie Sheen. [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:37 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
For example, I realized that Mark Lemley's Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office has 368 citations—more than any on this list—but it doesn't show up when you search the JLR database for "patent," even though it has "patent" in the title. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Wes Anderson
Finally, and perhaps most damningly, the examining attorney issued an advisory suggesting that the mark — or what’s left of it once an amended drawing is provided — may consist of unregistrable, functional matter (which we cover in spades on this blog). [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:22 am by Susan Perera
 I guess such is the case in the world of social media where current events can be discussed ad nauseam in a matter of minutes. [read post]