Search for: "Mines v. State"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 3,507
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
In a case not yet fully briefed or set for argument, Mach Mining LLC v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
In a case not yet fully briefed or set for argument, Mach Mining LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
Ct. 2729, 2733 (2011) (indirectly quoting R.A.V.); United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation As [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
United States, 533 F. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:59 am
As the Court stated in Terry v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm
NEW MEXICO: Sudden (Not) In United Nuclear Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:56 am
., stated that where a party had received a benefit under an Order, it could not claim that it was valid for one purpose and invalid for another. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Slip at 4, citing United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:25 am
Section 6 – Emergency Assistance The Artemis Accords echo the language of not just the Outer Space Treaty, and particularly Article V, but also the 1968 Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space (known as the Rescue and Return Agreement), which in Article II stipulates that states must take all possible steps to rescue the personnel of a spacecraft and render all necessary assistance. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:41 pm
Here’s how the Arkansas court of appeals looked at the case, DeSoto Gathering Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
An excerpt: In a dramatic move, the state Supreme Court depublished two of those rulings — Lamps Plus Overtime Cases, 195 Cal.App.4th 389, and Hernandez v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:20 am
In Aubin v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:38 am
Mine is a yellow icon on my desktop. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 1:31 pm
Nagle, Prosecuting the Use of Anti-personnel Mines By Illegal Armed Groups: The Colombian Situation Christopher H. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
V. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 11:01 am
See, e.g., Matar v. [read post]
