Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 7,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2010, 7:45 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 1:54 pm
By Joy P. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:11 am
By Joy P. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
When it considered the very same phrase in R v Salford Health Authority; Ex p Janaway [1989] AC 537, the House of Lords decided that “treatment” meant “the process of treatment in hospital for the termination of pregnancy” and “participate” meant “actually taking part in that process”. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Lemen, 156 P.3d 339, 351 (Cal. 2007) (likewise). [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:57 am
(a) & (b).)(9) (Marquez, supra, 32 Cal.App.5th at pp. 575-576.)(10) (Id. at p. 567.)(11) (Id. at pp. 570, 574-575, discussing Curcini v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
By Joy P. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 9:02 pm
Jones v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 1:32 am
Kenneth Cole, 40 Cal.4th at p. 1105, fn. 7. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
The human rights argument was dealt with very briefly at the end of this long judgment. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:54 am
HART V. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 12:23 pm
Code Regs. tit. 2, § 11065(p)(L).) [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 10:56 pm
Christchurch BC ex p Conway). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 8:05 am
For over 35 years, the firm of James P. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
Smith v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:32 am
Long Island R. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:29 pm
That simple statement goes a long way toward explaining why so many companies have made so many acquisitions that have produced so little value. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
Hart, Jr, (describing Perry v. [read post]
