Search for: "People v Favors" Results 2181 - 2200 of 11,769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
”[6] Although any actual apportionment, upon which reasonable people can disagree, must be made by the trier of fact, whether the plaintiff’s harm is apportionable is a question for the court.[7] Judicial Applications of Apportionment Principles Some of the earliest cases apportioning property damages involved the worrying and killing of sheep by dogs belonging to two or more persons. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 8:27 am by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
The public policies underlying the use of prior acts evidence predate Pa.R.E. 404 itself, as foreshadowed by Homewood People’s Bank v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
If Peter raises the First Amendment as a defense, he loses--even though Deirdre is invoking the power of the state (in the form of the judge) to obtain an order to Peter that he pay damages.Some readers at this point might be thinking: what about Shelley v. [read post]
According to her, she was scheduled for less-crowded shifts, which equated to fewer tips, and was given less favorable assignments during her shift. [read post]
According to her, she was scheduled for less-crowded shifts, which equated to fewer tips, and was given less favorable assignments during her shift. [read post]