Search for: "People v Goode"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 22,563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 1:22 pm
Last Friday a divided Appellate Division, Fourth Department ruled that an extended investigation resulting from a tinted-windows stop was illegal, and suppressed drugs, dismissed drug possession, assault 2, resisting arrest and OGA convictions as a result (People v Edwards, 2009 WL 2635784 [4th Dept 8/28/09]). [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 7:22 am
Case citation: Mirza v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
Take HHS v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 12:57 pm
US v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
Utah v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:50 am
In Legacy Church v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:44 am
Rogers v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
Thing is, if you look at that argument, it's a pretty good statement. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 10:01 am
See New York Times v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 10:43 am
In Feder v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:39 pm
People v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
The High Court ruled that the respondents’ mark was a well-known mark, inter alia, because: (a) the public and people involved in the trade had identified the respondents’ mark with the respondents’ goods distributed by them. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:11 am
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has slapped a law firm that sought to hire only Wiccans as litigators with a $100,000 fine.In the recent case of Good v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 6:04 am
Kudos to Simple Justice for bringing us the inside tale of a how the system really works.Let's see as SJ recounts it, the real story behind People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 8:48 am
We don't see misuse of NYCTA MetroCard charges very often, but the Court of Appeals decided such a case today in People v Hightower (#223 decided December 23, 2011). [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 11:15 am
See Swatch, S.A. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
O’Dell edited a book on Older People in Modern Ireland which contains various interesting essays), today’s decision is at odds with a trend towards a greater understanding of human rights and older people (although of course the House of Lords did not have that question before it). [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:10 am
Sounds good to you. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:48 am
I won't attempt to defend my views on this one, and reasonable people can (and surely do) disagree. [read post]
