Search for: "People v High" Results 2181 - 2200 of 15,044
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2012, 8:57 am
Ex Post Facto Violation The only serious challenge to Heidi's Law was People v Perkins, Court of Appeals No. 281957. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:24 am by Tian Lu
Like all elements from written works, character designs cannot be protected as independent works, because one written work derives only one copyright title [Chao v Qujing Cigarette Factory, case reference: High People’s Court of Yunnan Province (2003) Yunnan High Minsanzhongzi No. 16 (in Chinese). [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 5:39 am
The Supreme Court recently held in New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:33 am
 Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd and others v Zeebox Ltd may not be the biggest and most important case to come before the Chancery Division of the High Court for England and Wales this year-- in fact it may be one of the least significant -- but it's an interim decision of the freshly-promoted Mr Justice Birss, upon whom all admiring eyes now rest. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 8:55 am by JB
 I invited several people to join me in July 2004, and by the end of the summer, Balkinization was established as a group blog.Since then we've largely stuck to our mission: providing serious commentary on legal and political issues, especially those related to the Constitution.I'd like to thank all of the contributors over the last ten years who have maintained the blog's high standards and scholarly approach, and all of the millions of readers who have visited us over the… [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Herbalife.com commented on the recent ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in its decision in FTC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It allows people to sue under the Equal Protection Clause when they get screwed by the government. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In People v Lockridge, defendant was jury convicted of the involuntary manslaughter of his wife and faced sentencing guidelines of 43 to 86 months.Sentencing Judge Nanci Grant found "substantial and compelling" reasons to deviate from the guidelines: Lockridge killed his wife in front of their 3 young children, leaving her corpse among them; he had a probation violation, and was involved in at least one other incident of domestic violence. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:32 pm by Frank Pasquale
Perhaps at no other time in American history have the two been so wonderfully wed as to serve the high principles of both constitutional guarantees.It's hard to imagine that the same Court that gave us Florence v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
The justice who is editing a long opinion may miss something, because people get impatient. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 10:42 am
He notes that on Monday, SCOTUS will hear Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 12:35 am by Jon Gelman
Flanking them were James Sherk, also of the Heritage Foundation, and William Messenger, the attorney from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation who argued Harris v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 In a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit, plaintiffs' attorneys said in part:RFRA originally protected all religious viewpoints and insured a high level of protection for peoples' free exercise of religion. [read post]