Search for: "People v Weeks" Results 2181 - 2200 of 15,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star… [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:50 am by Lisa R. Pruitt
  Hunter's headline speaks volumes, "Food security v energy security:  land use conflict and the law. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
I'd love to have people's comments this week, since I owe the journal a final draft Saturday the 24th. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
For instance: Janus holds that the First Amendment generally bars compelling people to turn over money to a private organization that will use it for speech.[9] But Rumsfeld v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 8:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
This case, along with the one from last week, are good data points for lobbyists who are looking to get the attention of a legislator. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://thinkipstrategy.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: USPTO opens Application Exchange Program to all applicants (Anticipate This!) [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:16 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
As the nation increasingly embraces the constitutional amendment solution to Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am by INFORRM
Next Week in the Courts The trial of Fiddes v Channel Four is listed to begin on Monday 21 June 2010 before Tugendhat J. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]