Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 52,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2009, 11:06 am
But I'll share it anyway: I'm somewhat internally more reluctant to believe guilt in closely-disputed cases when the sentence is (essentially) life in prison as opposed to, say, a decade. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 6:02 pm
In this case, from the LAPD. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 12:57 pm
Which interprets the term "likely" in such a way to be unrecognizable to anyone who uses this same term in everyday language.Are there a plethora of other California cases that do the same thing? [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Not an easy case. [read post]
28 May 2009, 2:00 pm
Sure, in this case, it's a correctional officer rather than a police officer that gets hit. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:34 pm
Resolving what is unquestionably an ambiguous statutory scheme, the Court holds that you only have to use your turn signal if other traffic will or might be affected by your turn, and if (but only if) that's the case, the turn signal needs to be on for 100 feet. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
"Here's yet another case. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 11:32 am
Justice Moreno contends that permitting imposition of the death penalty in such cases -- at least as applied by the California Supreme Court -- doesn't appear to constitutionally (or rationally) distinguish between those individuals who deserve the death penalty and those who do not. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:45 am
Maybe it's just a totally unique case. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:04 pm
There's no way the result in this case is crystal clear, and I could easily see a jury deciding there was reasonable doubt. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
In its judgment in the case of Handzhiyski v Bulgaria ([2021] ECHR 283) the Fourth Section of the Court held, by a six-one majority, that convicting and fining a local politician who had placed a Santa Claus hat on a statute of a former Communist and put a red sack at its feet as part of a political and satirical protest was an unjustified interference with his right to freedom of expression under Article 10. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
In a 4-3 decision, affirming the Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:58 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 11:23 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Org., which could be the case in which the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:40 pm
I previously noted some recent cases on design copyright infringement, including Barrett v Metricon. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:38 am
The Supreme Court will be back in action next week, and will hear a case about the future of the exclusionary rule when it hears the arguments of Utah v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
On Oct. 3, the ACLU will be back in the Supreme Court to argue Jennings v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 8:56 am
United States gave Miranda v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
This case was wholly unlike the case of Pieretti v Enfield London Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1104; [2011] PTSR 565 (which held that the section 49A duty complements a housing authority’s duties to the homeless under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996). [read post]
