Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 3,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
(People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:15 pm
The decision is just a Superior Court Order so it's not statewide precedent. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 10:24 pm
Talbot v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:36 pm
Freeman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am
He lamented the uncertainty created by the US Supreme Court's odd ruling in US v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 6:23 pm
Last week the Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a jury award of $443,418.09 in the case of Renna v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am
And so the Supreme Court said that while it's not OK to kill the insane, it's perfectly fine to kill crazy people as long as they aren't insane in a particular way.The Court decided Ford v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:37 pm
Counsel also learns that the experts will also disclose any active threats by the interviewee to kill people, on the ground that if they fail to do so, there's liability under Tarasoff.Counsel doesn't like that, and thinks that everything should be confidential. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:09 am
A more surgical response is to remedy the deficiency by reading in the under-inclusive indigency provision in the Rules to include people who are “in need”: see Schachter v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
The 2001 Act only allowed for penalty of IR£500 or 6 months for failure to disclose passwords and as far as we are aware these penalties were never imposed.The Superior Courts in Ireland have on occasion in recent years issued Anton Pillar Orders and other civil warrants which required individuals to disclose passwords to representatives of Civil plaintiffs, under threat of being held in contempt and summarily jailed. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:41 am
He relied on "the principles laid down in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 10:07 am
February 16, 2013 Earlier this month, the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in the Yellow Pages Marketing misleading advertising case (see: Competition Bureau v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
Peoples Bank & Trust Co., 25 N.J. 17, 35 (1957). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
The Ontario Superior Court, in a decision reported [2010] O.T.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
The Supreme Court long ago recognized the problem, in a portion of Argersinger v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 11:31 am
By Amy Clarise AshworthState v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
As relevant here, the petitioner was convicted in a California superior court of two crimes -- corporal injury on a spouse, enhanced by use of a deadly weapon; and assault with a deadly weapon. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
The Superior Court dismissed his application, finding that there had been a full public consultation, and a ministerial review of science-based evidence. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:58 am
His latest one, Espenscheid v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
III – THE BEHAVIOUR OF quarrelsome SYLVIO LANGEVIN 1 – The history of the applicant [18] An inventory probably incomplete litigation initiated by the applicant indicates that it has undertaken since 2001 at least 29 action in the Superior Court, at the same time he spoke 12 times in the Court of Appeal, as well as 4 times in the Supreme Court of Canada. [19] Among these disputes, Mr. [read post]
