Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 2181 - 2200 of 178,369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2009, 4:41 am
Tiaa-Cref Individual & Institutional Services LLC This matter was before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, following Plaintiffs Acceptance of Offer of Judgment (”OJ”). [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
The plaintiff also failed to refute evidence from a church member’s affidavit that parking areas in this condition are common in rural Louisiana and that there had never been any accidents in the church lot before. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:40 am by Daniel Miller
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently affirmed a trial court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings and dismissal of two individual plaintiffs’ claims in a putative class action lawsuit. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 3:30 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
The Sixth Circuit ruled that a plaintiff had standing to lodge a pre-enforcement challenge to Ohio's criminal ban on ballot selfies. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 9:39 am by James Billings-Kang
A Pennsylvania federal court recently denied Defendant Synchrony Group, LLC’s motion to dismiss a trade secret lawsuit filed by Plaintiff Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Well, plaintiffs customers might be lost to defendant, and vice versa. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:40 am by <a href=''>Seyfarth Shaw LLP</a>
She warned that the Court’s understanding of state law may be “wrong” as to the question of a plaintiffs standing to pursue representative claims once the plaintiffs individual claims are ordered to arbitration, and noted that, “in an appropriate case, [California courts] will have the last word. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 5:16 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
She warned that the Court’s understanding of state law may be “wrong” as to the question of a plaintiffs standing to pursue representative claims once the plaintiffs individual claims are ordered to arbitration, and noted that, “in an appropriate case, [California courts] will have the last word. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
"Given the scientifically undisputed risk of spreading this deadly virus," defendants' interest in protecting the public health from potential exposure to COVID-19 outweighed plaintiff's privacy interest in his quarantine status....Rejecting plaintiff's claim that his religious free exercise rights were violated, the court said in part:Here, even when viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the record is devoid of… [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Following this Court's dismissal of all claims against the Aquilinos and certain claims against the municipal defendants, the only viable claims that remain against the municipal defendants are for deprivation of the Plaintiffs' constitutional [*2] rights to equal protection of the laws and substantive due process, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:28 am
., who has served as vice-chair of ATLA's aviation section among other honors in representing the plaintiff's bar, writes in Florida's Daily Business Review taking issue with some of his colleagues' doomsaying about the Class Action Fairness... [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Lexfund’s new OCI insurance is a companion product designed to alleviate the plaintiffs anxiety and apprehension over the possibility of having to pay the defendant’s court costs if the claim is unsuccessful. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The opinion also stated that, especially in a world in which defendants are subject to general jurisdiction in only a handful of states, the effect of today’s opinion will be to curtail — and in some cases eliminate — plaintiffs’ ability to hold corporations fully accountable for their nationwide conduct. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
Fosamax plaintiffs' took another head shot Wednesday when another New Jersey state court jury found that a plaintiff's osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) was not caused by Fosamax. [read post]
The court, however, was not persuaded by the plaintiffs explanation of the delay and agreed to dismiss the plaintiffs case. [read post]