Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 5,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Relying on French case law, the court held that there is no infringement of trade mark rights when a first name is added to a surname already registered as a trade mark, provided that there is no state of confusion in the minds of the public be it visually, phonetically or orally. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:08 am
United States: Whether the “honest services” clause of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
’State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Crane, 50 Mich 182, 15 NW 73 (1883); Grand Rapids, etc R Co v Cheseboro, 74 Mich 466; 42 NW 66 (1889); Union Depot Co v Backus, 92 Mich 34; 52 NW 790 (1892). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm
The case followed another related decision in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
The Court has turned away each such challenge (most recently in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:20 am
” The Supreme Court judges state contractual impairments under a three-part test, stated in, among other cases, Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
But where the opt out involves a government official and the object of the opt out is a governmental service, the issue of discrimination cannot be avoided. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 3:49 pm
Consider, for instance, New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
First, Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and Ors. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 11:57 am
For publication opinions today (6): In Mike Perry, City of Charleston Sewer Dept. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:18 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/1/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v… [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others… [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:52 am
Specialty Insurance Co., No. 2:20-cv-00747 (D. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm
The case was remanded for further proceedings.Read More: Appeals court rules Oklahoma license plate suit has meritUnited States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
Yesterday, in Trump v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:50 am
Refusal to answer questions during an administrative disciplinary investigationMatter of Eck v County of Delaware, 36 AD3d 1180 There were many issues considered by the Appellate Division in deciding Eck’s appeal of an adverse Section 75 Civil Service Law disciplinary determination. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am
The site is owned by the federal government (government) and managed by the United States National Park Service (NPS). [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am
The FBI and other federal, state and local government authorities—as well as foreign governments—have made clear to the public and to the U.S. [read post]
