Search for: "Reiter v Reiter" Results 2181 - 2200 of 6,282
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 1:13 am by Jani Ihalainen
After the Advocate General's opinion in September the question of restricting the sale of luxury goods online has finally landed on the CJEU's desk, who handed down their judgment only last week.As a brief primer, the case of Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH concerned the sale of luxury cosmetics made by Coty. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 8:51 pm by Geneviève Geneau
On 27 September 2016, Al Mahdi was found guilty of war crimes for intentionally directing attacks in 2012 against historic monuments and buildings dedicated to religion (The Prosecutor v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 5:15 am by Terry Fokas
In Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v Manufacturing Technologies, Inc., the U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:28 am by Florian Mueller
I haven't blogged about this case in a long time and won't spend much time now, but I wish to be of service to my readers here since there doesn't seem to be any reporting in the IT press about how yesterday's Oracle v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:27 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El secretario del Departamento de Vivienda (DV), Fernando Gil Enseñat, reiteró el compromiso de su agencia para facilitar los procesos para que las familias afectadas por los huracanes puedan adquirir viviendas seguras. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm by Oliver Heinisch
Justice Birss in the Unwired Planet v Huawei case ([2017] EWHC 711 (Pat)), namely that there should be no discrimination between implementers that are “similarly situated” and suggests a case-by-case, or sector-by-sector approach. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:07 pm by Oliver Heinisch
Justice Birss in the Unwired Planet v Huawei case ([2017] EWHC 711 (Pat)), namely that there should be no discrimination between implementers that are “similarly situated” and suggests a case-by-case, or sector-by-sector approach. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:07 pm by Oliver Heinisch
Justice Birss in the Unwired Planet v Huawei case ([2017] EWHC 711 (Pat)), namely that there should be no discrimination between implementers that are “similarly situated” and suggests a case-by-case, or sector-by-sector approach. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:07 pm by Oliver Heinisch
Justice Birss in the Unwired Planet v Huawei case ([2017] EWHC 711 (Pat)), namely that there should be no discrimination between implementers that are “similarly situated” and suggests a case-by-case, or sector-by-sector approach. [read post]