Search for: "STATE v CLARK" Results 2181 - 2200 of 3,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:09 am by New Books Script
Columbus : Ohio State University Press, 2011 vii, 181 p. ; 24 cm. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
He did not work for NME and was never discarded by the IPC as a possible editor for the magazine.” Jeremy Clarke-Williams, Russell Jones Walker, acted for the claimant. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Tuesday 24 April 2012 are the linked appeals of R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, which are listed for three days to be heard by a panel of five (L Hope, L Walker, L Clarke, L Dyson and L Wilson). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:16 am by Colin Murray
Abu Hamza’s case (Ahmad v United Kingdom [2012] ECHR 609) saw the claimants contend that the regime in place in “SuperMax” (highest level of security) prisons in the United States was in itself comparable to inhuman and degrading treatment. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:07 am by cebca
Weinfeld of Parker, Milliken, Clark, O’Hara & Samuelian in Los Angeles. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:34 pm by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: CHRISTINA CLARK v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:14 pm by nflatow
In the latest example, Nevada GOP Senator Dean Heller’s misunderstanding of the Supreme Court’s coincidentally-named D.C. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm by David Ettinger
On May 1, 2, and 3, the court will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): United Teachers of Los Angeles v. [read post]