Search for: "STATE v MURPHY" Results 2181 - 2200 of 2,306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2007, 4:44 pm
A full review of the Structured Settlement Protection Act, various state laws and the current state of affairs in factoring will make this a don't miss hour of CLE. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 4:02 pm
Rob is the acknowledged expert in the US in this area of the law and you won't want to miss his discussion on Murphy v IRS, taxable damage implications and how 468b trusts can and should be used to manage potential tax issues. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 6:46 pm
Nine specs were dismissed prior to the scheduled date of Colonel Murphy's Article 32 hearing (which Colonel Murphy subsequently waived).Interestingly, the Times article states that the larceny specs are unrelated to the licensure issues that formed the original core of the charges. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:00 am
  Located On: Helms Mulliss & Wicker Most Popular State Law Article Rest Break and Meal Period Claims After Murphy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:45 am
Defense counsel requested a full hearing but was granted only a limited inquiry into the issue. 11:00 a.m. - Murphy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
Because the district court correctly held that this case sounds in contract and not in tort, we AFFIRM the holding of the district court. 07a0407p.06 2007/10/04 Murphy v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 7:51 pm
  The New York Times doesn't mention it, but the "offense" that got Bill Murphy(effectively) fired at Ole Miss was his insistence on teaching that Brown v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Murphy Professor of Law and Public Policy Studies, Duke University School of Law Panelists:--Scott G. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
April 2004 CanadaAbstractAlthough some studies suggest positive effects of treatment for sexual offenders, most studies have been hampered by the unknown influence of selective attrition (e.g., volunteers and drop-outs). [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:59 am
Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1067 (9th Cir. 2003) (citing Williams v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]