Search for: "Samsung" Results 2181 - 2200 of 6,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2016, 4:05 am by Ars Staff
 The devices in question include a Samsung laptop, a Fujitsu Siemens laptop, a Compaq computer tower, an SD card, and a Western Digital hard drive. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Steve Brachmann
2015 is the second straight year in which the list of top plaintiffs has been led by eDekka LLC, a patent holding company, which at times has been accused of exhibiting trolling behaviors... [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Steve Brachmann
The post Patent litigation report shows Samsung overtaking Apple as top defendant in 2015 appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:28 pm by Florian Mueller
Samsung (meaning their first case, with respect to which the Supreme Court has granted certiorari) and the Oracle v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/9bUAn9MWBg -> Porn site's use of TMs in metatags not confusing https://t.co/7XJzWptFgB -> Samsung gets U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Joseph, as an individual, seek an injunction against Apple, Samsung, Google, and Microsoft, requiring those companies to pay $1 billion annually to fund an ‘effective and ongoing national public education campaign’ to educate drivers on the dangers of using smart phones and smart watches while driving. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
Samsung dispute in the Northern District of California, but she has also presided over many other complex cases involving technology and cutting edge legal issues that face technology companies and has managed. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:33 am by Stuart Brooks, Olswang LLP
  As such, the inclusion of surface decoration on Samsung’s otherwise similar design was an important point of differentiation between the two. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
The Trunki caseThe key cases relevant to these questions were Proctor & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser [2007] EWCA Civ 936, in which it was held that a registered design based on a line drawing was for the shape alone, and Samsung v Apple [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, in which Apple had contended that lack of ornamentation was a feature of the simple line drawing of a tablet which they had registered as the design. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/9bUAn9MWBg -> Porn site's use of TMs in metatags not confusing https://t.co/7XJzWptFgB -> Samsung gets U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:55 am by Amy Howe
  In the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz reports on the Court’s grant of review in Samsung Electronics v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 5:22 pm
"Supreme Court to Hear Samsung Appeal on Apple Patent Award": Adam Liptak has this article in today's edition of The New York Times. [read post]