Search for: "Shields v. Shields" Results 2181 - 2200 of 6,361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2009, 8:16 pm by Karen G. Hazzah
When presented with such arguments, the Board often cites to Winner Int’l Royalty Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
Next month’s oral argument in King v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111, 1112; Wiggins & Kopko,… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:41 am by INFORRM
Instead, its entire case in the context of the strike out was mounted on the basis that it was shielded from all liability under the DPA by virtue of the protections afforded to intermediary ‘internet society services’ (ISSs) under Part IV of theE-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EC). [read post]