Search for: "Shields v. State" Results 2181 - 2200 of 4,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 10:42 am
"  The decision indicates that "common interest warranting a qualified privilege" has been found to exist between employees of an organization [Loughry v Lincoln First Bank, 67 NY2d 369], members of a faculty tenure committee [Stukuls v State of New York, 42 NY2d 272], and employees of a board of education [Green v Kinsella, 36 AD2d 677]. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 7:00 am by Peter Swire
A central issue in Schrems v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Ashley Deeks
Does the agreement’s privacy provision even have enough teeth to offer a shield against Chinese-level facial surveillance? [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Privacy Shield Director Alex Greenstein, are on the “home stretch. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:54 am by Unknown
The amici stated that the SEC’s claim that the Fifth Circuit was incorrect in holding that the SEC’s administrative proceedings violate the Seventh Amendment’s guarantee of a jury trial is undercut by the SEC’s positions in previous cases.They cited SEC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:29 am by jonathanturley
The Court expressly stated that it was not ruling on this question in its 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
”On appeal, the Court of Appeals -- New York State’s highest court -- made two significant determinations:1. [read post]