Search for: "Spells v. Spells"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 3,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2017, 5:09 pm
See Maple Leaf Broadcasting v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
” For an oil and gas lease to be an enforceable contract, the following general, contractual requirements must be present: (i) meeting of the minds; (ii) consideration; (iii) capacity; (iv) legality; (v) definiteness; and (vi) the lease must be in writing. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:38 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
’” Id. at *8 (quoting Unites States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:45 am
The case in question is Case C‑657/11 Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology BV v Bert Peelaers, Visys NV, a ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) which was published yesterday on a request for a preliminary ruling made by the Belgian Hof van Cassatie in December 2011 [Merpel notes that, even inclusive of the time taken to ask the Advocate General for an Opinion, and possibly even to read it, the CJEU dealt with this reference in less than… [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:11 am
See Cumbie v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:36 am
A 2003 case, Eldred v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:47 am
Gordon v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
This approach was adopted by the High Court in this case and was a matter of common ground and accepted by Mr Justice Birss in Thomas Pink v Victoria's Secret UK Limited [2014] EWHC 2631. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am
To remove any doubt whether discussions between the parties constitute mediation, drafters should consider spelling out the mediation process in greater detail than the bare-bones provision in Verkhoglyad, by naming the proposed mediator or mediation forum and by requiring written demand to initiate mediation. [read post]
19 May 2017, 3:00 am
Chan Healthcare Group PS v Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 2017 WL 24619 (9th Cir. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am
To remove any doubt whether discussions between the parties constitute mediation, drafters should consider spelling out the mediation process in greater detail than the bare-bones provision in Verkhoglyad, by naming the proposed mediator or mediation forum and by requiring written demand to initiate mediation. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
But in Levine v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 6:43 am
Arnold Palmer Golf Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:16 pm
., v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 11:28 pm
In Nguyen v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:19 am
Although Miranda v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:49 pm
The case is PPL Montana v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 8:35 am
Thus, the procedures spelled out in Friday's opinion will begin immediately to affect the first case challenging a CSRT decision -- a case now proceeding in the Circuit Court on the merits, aiming toward a Sept. 17 hearing (Paracha v. [read post]
