Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 2181 - 2200
of 15,317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2008, 11:30 am
The Court affirms its prior opinion insofar as it held that solicitation to commit murder is not a felony involving the use or threat of violence to the person of another within the meaning of NRS 200.033(2)(b), and as it held that the State's notice of intent to seek the death penalty did not satisfy the requirements of SCR 250(4)(c) because it was vague and uncertain as to the aggravating circumstance of pecuniary gain. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:35 am
B. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
Galletta v Siu-Mei Yip, 271 AD2d 486, 486 [2d Dept 2000] ["Since the judgment entered upon the defendants' default in appearing at trial was obtained without the plaintiff's compliance with CPLR 321 (c), it must be vacated"]; McGregor v McGregor, 212 AD2d 955, 956 [3d Dept 1995] ["The record reveals no compliance with the leave or notice requirements of CPLR 321 (c). [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:02 am
State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:35 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:02 am
Here's today's opinion, Matal v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:45 am
The ECJ today handed down a case in a landmark decision regarding data protection and the Internet (Case C-131/12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 10:11 am
Watson v. [read post]
29 Sep 2004, 12:28 pm
") § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) (Nov. 2002). [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:51 am
§ 216(b) (emphasis added); Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:27 am
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
The Panel in Tradewind Media, LLC d/b/a Intopic Media v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 2:35 pm
Following a rejection of the UKIPO's view to this issue a press release was issued, stating:"The President of the EPO has now referred a series of questions on the patentability of computer programs to the Enlarged Board. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:25 pm
(b) The employee’s acts or omissions were with malicious purpose, in bad faith, or in a wanton or reckless manner;(c) Civil liability is expressly imposed upon the employee by a section of the Revised Code. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
Do Contract A obligations survive the formation of Contract B? [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:54 pm
[An overlooked part of United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 5:57 am
Department of Justice in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
From Magistrate Judge Lauren Louis's decision in Griffin v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:01 am
(b) The employee's acts or omissions were with malicious purpose, in bad faith, or in a wanton or reckless manner;(c) Civil liability is expressly imposed upon the employee by a section of the Revised Code. [read post]
