Search for: "State v. English" Results 2181 - 2200 of 6,457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2024, 8:32 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:48 pm
Lord Sumption stated that the English position is clear - the prosecution history is only referred to in exceptional circumstances [Merpel - are those exceptional circumstances clear?]. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
  The High Court is applying tort principles under English law – misuse of private information having been confirmed to be a tort). [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:23 am
Most of the Chinese-speaking Community in the UK also speak English. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
We live today in a global community¡V in particular, a global legal community¡V and we would like to foster legal scholarship on a transnational basis. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm by Bartolus
The English court then referred two questions on the validity of the Roaming Regulation itself to the Court of Justice. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
No English cases doing so have been uncovered either. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:44 am by admin
If you inherit the proceeds of another person’s IRA (“Individual Retirement Account”), your creditors may be able to reach and attach those proceeds, based upon a recent United States Superior Court Decision, Clark v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:20 am by Joel Goldstein
CARCO replies that the English doctrine is more nuanced; that English law does not automatically receive deference in maritime matters, especially when United States law governs, as is the case here; and that it is not clear that English law would be inconsistent with the 5th Circuit’s due-diligence approach. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
” Briefly: Amy Howe of this blog explains the Court’s latest decisions in plain English. [read post]