Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:52 pm
., 701 F.3d 1031 (5th Cir. 2012); Morning Mist Holdings Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:53 am
Miquel MontañáIn Odiorne v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
See Dulong, 261 S.W.3d at 894; McFarland, 293 S.W.3d at 763-64 (cases holding creditor could collect debt on account stated where, based on series of transactions reflected on account statements, creditor established that card holder agreed to full amount shown on statements and impliedly promised to pay indebtedness). [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm
Upstream is at issue in EFF’s Jewel v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:43 am
On June 19, 2009, in Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 12:14 pm
On June 19, 2009, in Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:08 am
The Second Circuit held that the non-bank loan holder was not entitled to the preemptive protection of the National Bank Act, which allows nationally chartered banks to export the interest rates of their home state without being subject to the usury limits of any other state in which the bank makes loans. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:16 am
Horne v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:48 am
Sevenson Environmental v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 3:04 pm
Gomes v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 4:19 am
The Apple v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:18 pm
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Apple v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 6:54 am
S’holders Litig., C.A. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 11:33 pm
("Unlike the FDCPA, the TDCPA encompasses foreclosure activities by mortgage holders. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:51 pm
Last week, this cert. petition (with appendix) was filed in the case of Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Holder, 660 F.3d 267, 271 (7th Cir. 2011), Gatimi v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm
To give a majority of the existing holders security in their ownership of the corporation, and to expressly prevent its dilution.All that's undercut -- egregiously -- by the Court of Appeal's holding. [read post]
