Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2008, 2:30 pm
By Eric Goldman Vulcan Golf, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
Other states, uncertain as to the impact of the pandemic on state revenue, opted to raise taxes. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:21 pm
JENNIFER MEDINA, Appellant. 2007-08320 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 6:54 am
E Clampus Vitus v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
Professor Michael McConnell points me to United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
Nola Spice Designs, LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
Readers might for instance recall the recent judgment in Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania [Katpost here], in which the ECtHR considered that a prohibition to use in advertising the image of Jesus and Mary on grounds of public morals should be regarded as an undue compression of the applicants' own freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
20 May 2016, 3:07 am
Tiffany Ferrara and WodSnob, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
” * Kassa v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:36 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Bus. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 8:29 pm
Plaintiff Mark P. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 10:17 pm
Loewen v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Mark Walsh covered the Court’s denial of certiorari in a special-education “stay put” case, Ridley School District v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:40 pm
All individuals and entities in the UnitedStates who (1) own, have owned, or otherwise have the right to enforce licensingrights to goods and services bearing trademarks or service marks registered withthe United States Patent and Trademark Office, (2) engage or have engaged incommercial transactions in Second Life associated with such registered trademarkor service marks, and (3) whose trademarks and/or service marks were infringedin Second Life.c) The Copyright… [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
This recommendation is not legally binding on Member States. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
