Search for: "State v. Phillips" Results 2181 - 2200 of 2,874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 3:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Shutter v Phillips Displav Components Co., 90 NY2d 703, 708 [1997].) [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:50 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Rodger sought to emphasise the reasoning of Lord Phillips, stating that “ordinary crimes” are not protected by privilege. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:39 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  The ABA Journal is reporting that Justice Sonia Sotomayor told the managing partner of Sydney Austin's Washington, D.C. office, Carter Phillips, to "slow down from the rhetoric", as Phillips began his argument before the High Court on behalf of the State of California in the Schwarznegger -v- Plata  prison overcrowding case.Justice Sotomayor also had a series of hard questions for California's appellate attorney such as how his… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:29 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Phillips (President) and Lord Rodger give the lead judgments. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
The state of California’s lawyer, Washington attorney Carter G. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
We and Melanie Phillips apologise for the error. [read post]