Search for: "State v. Pounds" Results 2181 - 2200 of 3,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:00 pm
Burnett reportedly weighed about 330 pounds. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:53 am
Mr Mosley was awarded £60,000 in damages (at [236]), currently the highest award of damages in a misuse of privacy case. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 12:57 am by Frank Cranmer
I have seen no justification for the alteration of the Faculty of sufficient weight to justify altering the current state of affairs. [28]. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
” The defendant resigned from the council prior to being convicted and was fined £509. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
While Zalewska v Department for Social Development (Northern Ireland) [2008] UKHL 67  is  not a housing case as such, I hope that many of our readers will still find this useful and interesting. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Wozniak & Anor v Randall [2021] EWHC 2341 (QB) (19 August 2021), Soole J gave judgment after the trial of a libel action, finding for the claimants and awarding each of them damages of £7,500. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by News Desk
The firm then place the 5-pound tubs of hummus in their walk-in cooler for cooling and finished product storage. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:15 pm
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT'---~F;:U'l";;ED;::---U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
By contrast, in the United States (see Firth v New York, 747 NYS 2d 69 (2002)) and in England (see the notes to section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013), the single-publication rule means a cause of action accrues only when the material is first accessed. [read post]