Search for: "State v. Primes" Results 2181 - 2200 of 2,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
United States The ongoing debate in the United States over the implementation of net neutrality, following the Federal Communications Commission decision to repeal enforcement laws, continues following AT&T releasing a statement in support of legislative change. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court actually has said very little in the nearly fourteen months since its five-to-four decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
’ Cambodia The Phnom Penh Municipal Court is moving ahead with a criminal defamation claim filed by Prime Minister Hun Sen against former opposition leader, Sam Rainsy. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
  The applicant had brought criminal proceedings against newspapers which alleged that he had murdered the Swedish Prime Minister in 1986. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Tom Goldstein
The district court in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am by INFORRM
There’s a fair amount of work to be done, but it’s rather so that we can consider in measured time the very important evidence that we’ve heard from the politicians, and in particular this week to have had the benefit of four Prime Ministers and any number of Secretaries of State puts the onus on getting it right rather high. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In the US, divided government (different parties control the presidency and Congress) is common, but in the UK, Prime Ministers and their cabinets must have the support of Parliament and usually the PM is the leader of a party with a parliamentary majority. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 10:47 pm by Mili Gupta
In fact, 35% of those polled stated that the school officials never interfered. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am by David Pocklington
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:17 am by Benjamin Bissell
Wells Bennett linked us to video of yesterday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 2:22 am by Léon Dijkman
In addition to setting the standard for equivalence in Dutch law, the decision provides a prime example of judicial dialogue. [read post]