Search for: "State v. R. G." Results 2181 - 2200 of 4,530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2014, 2:20 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Party autonomy and transaction planning Chapter V. consumer protection and private international law Chapter VI. revisiting jurisdictional issues: tort jurisdiction and transaction planning Chapter VII. drafting effective choice of forum agreements. 2) The Emancipation of the Individual from the State under International Law by G. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:43 am by John Elwood
Fleischman, Steven Wallman, and former SEC General Counsel Brian G. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 5:56 pm
Thirty years later, however, on June 25, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Miller v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
  This is a perspective that also conflates public and private law views of entities, be they states or corporations. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am by David Markus
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:12 am by Giles Peaker
R v Unah [2011] EWCA Crim 1837 [2012] 1 WLR 505 and R v Y(A) [2010] EWCA Crim 762 [2010] 1 WLR 2644The Magistrates did not appear to have approached the question of whether there was a reasonable basis for Ms G’s belief:They do not set out the facts which say what the reasonable basis for that belief was and there were a number of factors which they would have required to address, including the structure of the Tribunal’s decision, flat by… [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:12 am by Giles Peaker
R v Unah [2011] EWCA Crim 1837 [2012] 1 WLR 505 and R v Y(A) [2010] EWCA Crim 762 [2010] 1 WLR 2644The Magistrates did not appear to have approached the question of whether there was a reasonable basis for Ms G’s belief:They do not set out the facts which say what the reasonable basis for that belief was and there were a number of factors which they would have required to address, including the structure of the Tribunal’s decision, flat by… [read post]