Search for: "State v. Taylor " Results 2181 - 2200 of 3,341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2010, 3:09 am
The arbitrator ordered the County to restore the aides to full-time status [i.e., 35-hours per week] with back pay.A State Supreme Court judge vacated the award on the grounds that the arbitrator had misread the Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:17 am by Phil Dixon
Taylor Slip op. at 797. 490-day delay between arrest and trial did not violate Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial rights U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 11:48 am by Eric Goldman
Thus, the Thibodeauxes cannot show as a matter of law that Section 230(c)(1) would bar GCC’s participatory-liability claims. * Taylor v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:18 am
Challenging arbitration awards Coppa v State of New York, NYS Supreme Court, Justice A. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 4:05 am
The Taylor Law [Section 209-a.6, Civil Service Law] provides that "in applying this [Article], fundamental distinctions between private and public employment shall be recognized, and no body of federal or state law applicable wholly or in part to private employment, shall be regarded as binding or controlling precedent. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm by Amy Howe
Two separate challenges were before the court on Tuesday, but the justices spent most of their time and energy on the first case, which is known as Biden v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am by MOTP
   Section 254.004(a) of the Texas Estates Code provides as follows: (a) A contract executed or entered into on or after September 1, 1979, to make a will or devise, or not to revoke a will or devise, may be established only by: (1) a written agreement that is binding and enforceable; or (2) a will stating: (A) that a contract exists; and (B) the material provisions of the contract. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:31 am
” The leading cases addressing the issue of an individual’s electing a “negotiated disciplinary procedures” rather than an available statutory disciplinary procedure such as that provided by §75 of the Civil Service Law: Antinore v State of New York, 40 NY2d 6 and Abramovich v Board of Education, 46 NY2d 450. [read post]