Search for: "State v. York" Results 2181 - 2200 of 32,732
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2022, 2:49 pm by lennyesq
*** The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has inquired whether New York’s ” ‘special duty’ requirement” applies “to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence” or if it applies only to claims premised upon a municipality’s negligent “failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury inflicted other than by a municipal employee” (975 F3d 255, 291 [2d Cir 2020]). [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In the case, a New York state appellate court rejected parents' constitutional challenges to New York's repeal of the religious exemption from mandatory vaccination for school children. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 5:44 am by Caroline Camp
The trial was by jury in New York: People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 4:40 am
Torres [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], where the Court upheld New York's procedure for selecting state trial judges. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:20 am
But the Court nevertheless took the narrow route, holding unanimously that the sixty-day window for filing a notice of appeal only applies when the United States has formally intervened in the action. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Holland & Knight LLC v Walsam 316, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 33748(U) October 17, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654470/2022Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
All eyes are on New York State, and New York City, specifically, the “epicenter” of both America’s COVID-19 cases and the national economy. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]