Search for: "Stephen Roberts" Results 2181 - 2200 of 4,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2022, 5:21 pm by Angie Gou
Roberts and Kavanaugh exert their influence Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh remain in positions of power as the court’s median justices. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 11:26 pm by Amy Howe
The vote was 5-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts joining the court’s three liberal justices – Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan – in dissent. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 8:09 am by Charlotte Garden
Thomas nonetheless joined Roberts’ opinion “because it correctly applies our FAA precedents. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm by Mark Walsh
” Justice Sonia Sotomayor has written a dissent, joined by Stephen Breyer, the chief justice explains. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:48 pm by Amy Howe
Roberts raised, and then Kagan returned to, the first possibility. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:25 am by Amy Howe
Justice Stephen Breyer also appeared receptive to Bucklew’s argument. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am by Mark Walsh
Holder,” Chief Justice Roberts says. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am by Victoria Kwan
On October 17, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Stephen Breyer spoke at the 2017 First Circuit Judicial Conference in Rockport, Maine. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 11:43 am by Amy Howe
As Justice Stephen Breyer put it at one point, “This is an open box. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 2:27 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Stephen Breyer proposed a standard to evaluate incompetency claims in cases, like Madison’s, that do not involve arguments that the inmate is insane or delusional. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:28 pm by Derek Muller
” And Roberts cited none other than Marbury v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:50 am by Amy Howe
Justice Stephen Breyer, on the other hand, had a very different concern: He told Paul Clement, who represented the employers in the case, that he had not seen a path for Clement’s clients to win without “undermining and changing radically” the labor laws that are the “entire heart of the New Deal. [read post]