Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 55,033
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
Sandford, and Plessy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:43 pm
Windham Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Texas, Collens v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:44 am
However, FOSTA was not designed as an anti-CSAM law, so the plaintiffs’ claims don’t really fit the legal doctrine. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
On Monday, in Tingley v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 pm
Enacted in the wake of the July 4, 2022, shooting at an Independence Day parade in Highland Park, Illinois, that killed seven people and wounded 48, the ban applies to firearms that the law defines as “assault weapons”; it also applies to large-capacity magazines and some kinds of ammunition, although people who already own the items that would otherwise be prohibited can keep them by registering them with the police. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm
In Counterman v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:18 pm
Other courts have pointed out that the Supreme Court invalidated sodomy laws with its decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:54 am
The Fifth Circuit disagreed, upholding Texas’ law against essentially identical challenges. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
Black (2003) In this case, three men contested a Virginia law that made burning a cross a crime on its own, without unmistakable evidence that the act was made to intimidate people. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
That’s because Chevron—at least the part of it that most people are interested in—didn’t make binding law in the first place. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 11:20 pm
In Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
Secondly, the judgment only says that EU discrimination law does not prohibit such a rule. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:44 pm
Since the US Supreme Court’s 2021 Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:18 pm
In 1987, in McClesky v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Zeidenberg, 86 F.3d 1447, 1454-55 (7th Cir. 1996) A lot of people—particularly academics who disfavor the law and economics approach popularized at the University of Chicago—don’t like this opinion. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
Holmes, III in Doe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
By Barbara Pfeffer Billauer Approaches to resolving scientific evidentiary issues continue to diverge throughout the country.[1] A prominent recent example includes the rejection of the medical diagnosis of Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) to reflect disparate views in the scientific, medical, and legal communities. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:54 am
Footage showed people covered in powder from the extinguisher as security guards rushed people out of the vicinity. [read post]
