Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 51,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Nov. 1, 2012) (finding that given respondent's financial position, the awarding of any of petitioner's attorneys' fees against the respondent would be clearly inappropriate); Vale v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:21 am
Nebraska, 511 US 1 (1994). [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:54 am
In Kunitsyna v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
The issue in that case, Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:34 am
Morel Twitter Clarifies Usage Rules, but AFP Still Claims Unbridled Right to Use Content Posted to “Twitter/TwitPic Agence France-Presse Claims Twitter’s Terms of Use Authorize Its Use of Photographs Posted to TwitPic — Agence France-Presse v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:27 pm
At the Originalism Blog, University of San Diego law professor Michael Ramsey has some thoughtful commentary on a recent presentation I gave on the original meaning of public use, which was based on a chapter of a book I am currently working on, tentatively entitled The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 7:02 pm
” Garcia-Bengochea v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
I thought it would be useful to unpack the latest goings on. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
Mark William Ivey v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
However, the Court did recognize that customers who are able to book the services within the jurisdiction, should be considered as customers, even if the factual use of the service only occurs outside the jurisdiction.The Court also noted that consideration must be given to issues of public policy. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is AFL Telecommunications, LLC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
In Jones v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
As was stated by Lord Justice Gibson in Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd: "...the defence has never been held to apply to names of new companies as otherwise a route to piracy would be obvious". [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:12 am
Last week, the 11th Circuit, in Schumann v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:19 am
The decision of Joanna Smith J. in Frain & McKinnon v Reeves & Curnock [2023] EWHC 73 (Ch) (at 19), was cited with approval, from which the following relevant principles could be distilled: a. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:30 am
It’s been 64 years this week since Brown v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:44 pm
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:31 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:20 pm
The prosecution didn't use the Shotspotter data to "prove" the sounds were gunfire. [read post]