Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 2181 - 2200 of 51,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
Nov. 1, 2012) (finding that given respondent's financial position, the awarding of any of petitioner's attorneys' fees against the respondent would be clearly inappropriate);  Vale v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:21 am
Nebraska, 511 US 1 (1994). [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:34 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Morel Twitter Clarifies Usage Rules, but AFP Still Claims Unbridled Right to Use Content Posted to “Twitter/TwitPic Agence France-Presse Claims Twitter’s Terms of Use Authorize Its Use of Photographs Posted to TwitPic — Agence France-Presse v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:27 pm
At the Originalism Blog, University of San Diego law professor Michael Ramsey has some thoughtful commentary on a recent presentation I gave on the original meaning of public use, which was based on a chapter of a book I am currently working on, tentatively entitled The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
I thought it would be useful to unpack the latest goings on. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:21 am by Afro Leo
However, the Court did recognize that customers who are able to book the services within the jurisdiction, should be considered as customers, even if the factual use of the service only occurs outside the jurisdiction.The Court also noted that consideration must be given to issues of public policy. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Jani
As was stated by Lord Justice Gibson in Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd: "...the defence has never been held to apply to names of new companies as otherwise a route to piracy would be obvious". [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:19 am by David Pocklington
The decision of Joanna Smith J. in Frain & McKinnon v Reeves & Curnock [2023] EWHC 73 (Ch) (at 19), was cited with approval, from which the following relevant principles could be distilled: a. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:20 pm
  The prosecution didn't use the Shotspotter data to "prove" the sounds were gunfire. [read post]