Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 2181 - 2200 of 10,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2020, 6:45 am by Sophie Corke
The German Pelham court confirms when sampling is illegalNever Too Late 263 [Week ending May 3] The CJEU (again) on 3D trademarks: the Gömböc judgment | The non-systematic relevance of earlier IP rights: from Gömböc to Brompton Bicycle | Trade marks and mobile apps: the PlanetArt v Photobox saga draws to a close (in PlanetArt's favour) | SkyKicked: High Court confirms trade mark infringement | Is COVID-19 a Nietzschean moment for… [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm by Josh Blackman
Do they hold a "Public Trust under the United States"? [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
After almost three weeks with almost no activity, the criminal case involving the United States v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:14 am
  The connection with accounting remained, but reduced to a dimension increasingly rejected by Western society as abhorrent to its ideals emerging from the Enlightenment (famously in Dostoevsky, Brothers Karamazov (Constance Garnett, trans.: NY Lowell Press) Bk V, Chp V, The Grand Inquisitor)). [read post]
16 May 2020, 12:23 am by Ralf Michaels
Interestingly, there is also a reverse suit by state-backed Chinese lawyers against the United States for covering up the pandemic. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:37 am by INFORRM
This week was marked be partial re-openings across all states, more details of which can be found on the CNN website. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
Mark and Emily come to an agreement to have a bench trial. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:29 am by Larry
United States is a case about the classification of used clothing coming into the United States.The plaintiff imported bales of used clothing and classified the merchandise in HTSUS item 6309.00.00 as "worn clothing," which is a duty free. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
Though this would mark an enormous sea change in historical practice, it gets the U.S. better aligned with most of its allies’ military systems. [read post]
Case date: 20 April 2020 Case number: No. 18-56221 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Philippine The Press Gazette had an article “Filipino government shuts down major news network during pandemic” United States A Pennsylvania hobby company filed a defamation lawsuit accusing Mattel, Rubik’s Brand, Velcro and four other companies of falsely claiming it sold counterfeit products, causing Amazon.com to remove it from its online platform. [read post]