Search for: "Warren v. Warren" Results 2181 - 2200 of 2,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court declared that anti-mixed marriage statutes were unconstitutional, in the landmark civil rights case Loving v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:19 am
McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Tuesday, May 31, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Bebchuk-Brav-Jiang study, Brokaw Act, Disclosure, Hedge funds, Lobbying, Long-Term value,Oversight, Proxy advisors, Reporting regulation, Schedule 13D, SEC, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals,Shareholder rights, Shareholder value, Short-termism, Transparency SEC, Financial Reporting, and Financial Fraud Posted by Rob Carangelo and Paul Ferrillo, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Wednesday, June… [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:09 am by Gene Takagi
The data provides an unprecedented look inside the financial lives of America’s titans, including Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch and Mark Zuckerberg. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
  I'm not sure how much more I managed in my summary of recent scholarship on Pierson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:39 am
Opponents of the death penalty in many other states, and in Congress, have been floating similar legislation since 1987, when the Supreme Court handed down an influential decision in a case known as McCleskey v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Akhil Amar
" He had been tipped off about the Supreme Court’s decision in the Dred Scott v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:37 am
  Because of the important consumer benefits from rules that protect the ability of businesses to engage in truthful comparative advertising, Public Citizen has litigated that right over the years in a line of cases running from Virginia Pharmacy Bd. v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:24 am by Randy Barnett
I think the better analysis of the Thirteenth Amendment was explained by Justice Harlan in his dissenting opinions in the Civil Rights Cases and Plessy v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:57 pm by Angie Gou
” Siegel argued instead that the relevant originalism is “a value-laden politics, a multi-decade political project of the conservative legal movement embedded in the Republican Party whose announced goal is reversing Roe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 4:42 am by Gail Heriot
But, there, Larry was just being mainstream: He was agreeing with the Supreme Court in Washington v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:40 am by jonathanturley
Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass, has declared the Supreme Court illegitimate and has called to pack the Court for rending opinions against “widely held public opinion. [read post]