Search for: "Wells v. Wells" Results 2181 - 2200 of 98,988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
It's an important issue, and one that I imagine arises with some frequency; indeed, introducing testimony like this may well arise from an outline that a wide variety of prosecutors use when examining witnesses who have made a deal.If Part I is right, I'd publish it. [read post]
30 May 2011, 1:54 pm
  I might well have given him more than the two years in prison he received. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:17 am by sally
Regina (Gaunt) v Office of Communications (Liberty intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 692; [2011] WLR (D) 201 “The provisions of the Ofcom Broadcasting Code had to be interpreted, as well as being applied in a particular case, so as to comply with the requirements of the right to freedom of expression in article 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 9:24 pm
Of course, the problem goes both ways, since I'm sure there's also the dynamic of people deliberately misrepresenting their health status as well, which raises premiums for everyone. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:26 pm
Let's just say: It did not turn out well for Mr. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by INFORRM
In the case of Traveller Movement v Ofcom ([2015] EWHC 406 (Admin)) one of the nation’s great televisual fascinations became the unlikely subject of an Administrative Court judgment that demonstrates the limits of common law standards of fairness, as well as the lightness of touch applied by the courts when reviewing the decision-making of the media regulator. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
In advance of the conference, the Justices may issue opinions as well. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 2:32 am
Bailey we see the confusion and trouble it can cause: "Leo Wells sought specific performance of an agreement to convey real property or, in the alternative, money damages (Wells v Ronning, 269 AD2d 690 [2003]). [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:03 pm
I think the California Supreme Court may well say "No. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 11:13 am by Peter Groves
He cited his own judgment in Primary Group (UK) Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2014] EWHC 1082 (Ch), as well as the Court of Appeal's decision in Racing Partnership Ltd v Done Brothers (Cash Betting) Ltd [2020] EWCA Civ 1300. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:30 am by Glenn Reynolds
Well, we’ve had the Coffee Party, the Brownbaggers, The Other 95%, A New Way Forward, the One Nation Movement — am I leaving any out? [read post]
18 May 2017, 8:23 pm by Aurora Barnes
§ 103 where the patents make at most trivial advances over technologies well-known to a person of skill in the art; (2) whether the court’s decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:59 pm
"It is well-established that 'the Fourth Amendment is not implicated simply because an individual violates state law.' Armstead v. [read post]