Search for: ". Weinstein" Results 2201 - 2220 of 4,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Matthew Wansley and Samuel Weinstein (Yeshiva University), on Thursday, May 25, 2023 Editor's Note: Matthew Wansley is an Associate Professor of Law, and Samuel Weinstein is a Professor of Law at Benjamin N. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:20 am by Ron Coleman
Lauren Weinstein, of People for Internet Responsibility — an organization whose slick, professional website suggests it has not done or even said all that much lately (though Weinstein’s blog look somewhat active) — tells Reuters, “There’s really no good reason to hold onto that information for more than a few months. . . . [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Matthew Wansley and Samuel Weinstein (Yeshiva University), on Thursday, May 25, 2023 Editor's Note: Matthew Wansley is an Associate Professor of Law, and Samuel Weinstein is a Professor of Law at Benjamin N. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:51 am by Anthony Lake
Judge Weinstein stated that Stein's age made it unlikely that he would commit any further crimes. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 12:20 am
Weinstein, in his typically blunt fashion, said: "To those in the fundamentalist Christian cabal who vigorously oppose this long sought, terrific decision by the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 4:31 am
Schwartz, acknowledged to Weinstein that there is a problem. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:16 am
Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Wednesday, December 23, 2020 Editor's Note: Gail Weinstein is senior counsel, and Philip Richter and Steven Epstein are partners at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 10:01 pm
Weinstein's article focuses on the treatment of the execution procedures as state secrets; it quotes from this passage by our colleague Alison J. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am by admin
The point apparently weighed on Judge Weinstein’s conscience. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 7:01 am
  Section 3553(a)(6) should be construed as covering disparities in state-federal as well as federal-federal comparitive sentencing.UPDATE:  Check out the Sentencing Law and Policy blog discussion (with commentary) on Brennan and Judge Weinstein's analysis here. [read post]