Search for: "A B" Results 2201 - 2220 of 158,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2009, 5:32 am
A Washington judge should be able to hear about racist statements that jurors allegedly made during a medical malpractice trial because Washington state does not have a state counterpart to Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:43 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b) provides that Except for a criminal conviction under Rule 609, extrinsic evidence is not admissible to prove specific instances of a witness’s conduct in order to attack or support the witness’s character for truthfulness. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 2:00 am
Kysar (Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York) has posted A New Development in the "Subsequent Exchange" Approach Under the § 367(b) Regulations, 116 Tax Notes ___ (2007), on SSRN. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm by Eric C. Chaffee
Rapp has posted Plausible Cause: Exploring the Limits of Loss Causation in Pleading and Proving Market Fraud Claims Under Securities Exchange Act Section 10(b) and SEC Rule 10b-5 on SSRN with the following abstract: Loss causation is a... [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:00 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol David Reichenberg (Wilson Sonsini) asks Class Certification in Innovation Rich Spaces - Do 23(b)(3) Classes Need to Get More Innovative? [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 6:41 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b) provides that Except for a criminal conviction under Rule 609, extrinsic evidence is not admissible to prove specific instances of a witness’s conduct in order to attack or support the witness’s character for truthfulness. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:52 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b) provides that Except for a criminal conviction under Rule 609, extrinsic evidence is not admissible to prove specific instances of a witness’s conduct in order to attack or support the witness’s character for truthfulness. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 6:53 am by immigrationprof
"Disabled and Disserved: The Right to Counsel for Mentally Disabled Aliens in Removal Proceedings" Georgetown Immigration Law Review, Forthcoming ALIZA B. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:57 pm by laborprof lpb
Amara: Supreme Court Unconvincingly Rejects Use of ERISA §502(a)(1)(B) to Enforce Benefit Terms Used in SPD. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:08 pm by Securites Lawprof
Supreme Court recently addressed the issue of the two-year statute of limitations under section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, although it decided little in the opinion except that the Ninth Circuit was wrong. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 8:29 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(3) provides that authentication can be accomplished by "[c]omparison by the trier of fact or by expert witnesses with specimens which have been authenticated. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 5:48 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
In pertinent part, Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b) provides that Except for a criminal conviction under Rule 609, extrinsic evidence is not admissible to prove specific instances of a witness’s conduct in order to attack or support the witness’s character... [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:34 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Following up on Monday's post, in today's post, I want consider the impeachment implications raised by Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(B) and Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(C). [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 6:44 am by CivPro Blogger
Domino’s Pizza, LLC, which begins: The district court certified a Rule 23(b)(3) class of about 1,600 Minnesota delivery drivers employed by Domino’s Pizza LLC... [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:57 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(B) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth...matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to which... [read post]