Search for: "Adams v. Adams" Results 2201 - 2220 of 7,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In Kodiak Building Partners, LLC v Adams, the Delaware Chancery Court ruled that a non-compete contained in the parties’ sale of business agreement was overbroad. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:39 am by Berin Szoka
State Sales Taxes, Too Late for Carnaval Communications Daily: Hugo Chavez Rumored Replacement for Retiring FCC Commissioner, Promises Not to Regulate Internet Washington Post: Obama Makes Good on Campaign Transparency Promises, Installs 24/7 Webcams Throughout White House New York Times: New Study: Kids Under 13 Suddenly Start Lying about Age to Evade COPPA Parental Consent Requirement Gawker: State of the Net Conference Again Frustrated by Insufficient Bandwidth, Organizers Promise More Traffic… [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Wednesday, that will come to be known by the first case of the two: FERC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:50 am by Giles Peaker
It was possible for the Defendant to carry out checks of alternative properties for suitability outside the Adam system, or to pay outside the Adam system. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:10 pm
On July 30, 2009, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled against convicted peace protestors in Tataz, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, with commentary from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences (who also weighs in on the ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:38 am by Paul Pryzant and Matthew Simmons
The parties In a very recent opinion on October 6, 2022, by the Delaware Chancery Court, Kodiak Building Partners, LLC v Adams, Vice Chancellor Zurn ruled that the restrictive covenants imposed on a stockholder in an acquisition were overbroad and unenforceable. [read post]