Search for: "BAKER v. STATE" Results 2201 - 2220 of 3,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2010, 8:09 am by Jenny Egan
 In today’s Washington Post, Edwin Meese has an op-ed piece in which he argues that Judge Walker’s decision ignored binding Supreme Court precedent – namely, Baker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
  On this blog, Orin Kerr previewed the search-related issue presented in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 2:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The next case on their docket on the issue – Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 4:15 am
This week's oral arguments before the Supreme Court: This Wednesday, Nov. 14th: 9:30 AM - State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:50 pm by Stewart Baker
Gus Hurwitz draws the short straw and sums up the second installment of the Elon Musk v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Balancing competing rights Irish defamation cases are increasingly replete with comments stating the need to balance the constitutional right to freedom of expression with the constitutional right to a good name. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 12:31 am
- Cleveland attorney Joe Koncelik of Frantz Ward in his Ohio Environmental Law Blog NGOs Charged With Playing Larger Role in Climate Regulation and Climate Litigation - New York lawyer Jennifer Liu of Howrey on the firm's Global Climate Law Blog Criminal Background Checks - Act 73's Impact on Pennsylvania Employers - State College attorney John Baker of McNees Wallace & Nurick on the firm's Pennsylvania Labor and Employment Blog Federal… [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 11:57 am
State of Indiana , a 15-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:Appellant-defendant Kevin L. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]