Search for: "BAKER v. THE STATE" Results 2201 - 2220 of 2,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2014, 12:23 am by Florian Mueller
At any rate, the Supreme Court was divided over that one.A long, long time ago there was Baker v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am by Edith Roberts
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by NCC Staff
The issue made it to the Supreme Court, where Chief Justice Edward White wrote in Wilson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Narrowest Grounds, Asher Steinberg argues that the court’s decision this term in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 10:10 am
Meanwhile, during the Warren Court, when the lower federal courts and the Supreme Court could both be considered liberal, the Court loosened justiciability rules considerably in cases such as Baker v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
City of Chicago (2010), which applied the Second Amendment to the states. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
This is the third in the four-part series from the brain injury case of Gregory Joseph Gagnon, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm by Mike Aylward
Co. of the State of Pennsylvania, S153852 (Cal. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
In the case above, W v M & Ors [2011] EWHC 1197 (COP), Mr Justice Baker raised concerns that the family of ‘M’ gave “real consideration” over whether to continue with the case once they discovered the press interest in identifying and contacting them. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 5 November 2019 Steyn J handed down judgment in the case of Hemming v Baker [2019] EWHC 2950 (QB). [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
” Almost 16 years ago, the Supreme Court of Canada highlighted the importance of written reasons in administrative decisions (Baker v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
’ …” he nevertheless undertook a review of other potential grounds of continuing entitlement, noting trial and appellate authority supporting the proposition that the phrase “other cause” in the Divorce Act’s definition of “child of the marriage” is to be interpreted broadly (see Baker v Baker, (1994) 2 RFL (4th) 147 (ABQB), Gamache v Gamache, 1999 ABQB 313 and Olson v Olson, 2003 ABCA 56). [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]