Search for: "BE v. State" Results 2201 - 2220 of 258,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2009, 2:25 am
Regina (TF) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “A prisoner could be transferred to a mental hospital at the end of his sentence, only if two doctors recommended it and his medical condition and treatability justified it. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 1:25 am
Regina (Tabernacle) v Secretary of State for Defence Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “A ban on innocuous activities on publicly accessible land owned by the Ministry of Defence was unlawful. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:36 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) Queen’s Bench Division “Fair trial provisions guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights could not be overcome by a claim that the offended party's case had no possible chance of success. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:17 am
R (Wright and others) v Secretary of State for Health and another [2009] UKHL 3; [2009] WLR (D) 20 “The procedure under s 82(4)(b) of the Care Standards Act 2000 allowing the provisional listing of care workers as being unsuited to work with vulnerable adults after a complaint had been made about them, without giving them [...] [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:24 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Yates [2009] EWCA Civ 479; [2009] WLR (D) 184 “A Canadian widow who, on her marriage to a British national in Canada, received a British pension based on her husband's contributions and paid at the rate applicable to the inflation uprating he received, frozen at the time he [...] [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:52 am by sally
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CB and another [2012] EWCA Civ 418; [2012] WLR (D) 112 “Where a court made a non-derogating control order in proceedings against a person under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005, it had no jurisdiction to order a permanent stay of such proceedings under the Act nor under its case management powers in the Civil Procedure Rules, unless the controlled person requested such a course of action.” WLR Daily, 3rd April 2012… [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:56 am
MO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for Home Department Court of Appeal “Where no transitional provisions existed, applications made under a previous regime of rules would be adjudged under the current replacement rules. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:54 am by tracey
Regina (Modhej and another) v Secretary of State for Justice: [2012] EWCA Civ 957;  [2012] WLR (D)  210 “Where the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against sentence at a time by which, subsequent to the original passing of sentence, the law had changed in relation to release on licence, it was not the case that reliance could be placed on the particularities of such date in order to claim that it was the later provisions which governed matters… [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:47 am
Alton and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “An organisation that had no capacity to carry on terrorist activities and was taking no steps to acquire such capacity or otherwise to promote or encourage terrorist activities could not be said to be concerned in terrorism simply because its leaders had the contingent intention to resort to terrorism in the future. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 2:07 am
Continued detention of failed asylum-seeker is lawful Regina (A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “The continued detention, pending deportation, of a failed asylum-seeker after the end of a term of imprisonment because the safety of the public would be at risk and there was a high risk that he would abscond, was not unlawful. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:53 am
Regina (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions House of Lords “The policy of disentitling persons without accommodation from receiving the disability premium to which they would otherwise be entitled in their income support amounted to discrimination within article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights but was lawful as it could be justified on policy grounds. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 9:07 am
GO and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Overseas students could change their courses but if they wanted an extension of stay in the United Kingdom, they had to be able to produce evidence of satisfactory progress, whether on the course named in the application for entry clearance or on another recognised course. [read post]