Search for: "Campbell v State" Results 2201 - 2220 of 2,246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2007, 1:24 pm
And several weeks ago, the Court rejected the petition in Campbell and Pinks v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 1:23 pm
Stevens had formed part of the 6-3 majority in State Farm v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:49 pm
Leatherman Tool (2001) (the judicial review of jury verdicts awarding punitives must be "de novo"); State Farm v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:53 am
It goes something like this:Jury verdict for $800,000 in compensatory damages and $79.5M in punitive damages;Punitive damages reduced by trial court to $32M;Punitive damage award reinstated by Oregon Court of Appeals;Affirmed by Oregon Supreme Court;Remanded by US Supreme Court to decide punitive damages issue in light of its new ruling in State Farm v Campbell;Affirmed again by Oregon Court of Appeals;Affirmed again by Oregon Supreme Court;Now vacated by U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Campbell, 500 P.2d 21, 33-34 (Kan. 1972); City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
February 5, 2007Re: The Preternaturally Prolific Posner on Plagiarism.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 2:07 am
The Supreme Court denied certiorari yesterday in Campbell v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
Much of the rest of the world followed this, as well, until 1993, when the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:34 pm
Some years back they made quite a bit of law in a case called State Farm v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:04 am
Some years back they made quite a bit of law in a case called State Farm v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 9:40 am
One, filed by Jeff Fisher, seeks review of State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 9:02 am
The Ninth Circuit basically held that the evidence did not warrant a punitive award that went to the limit of what is permitted under State Farm v. [read post]