Search for: "Court of Appeals, 5th District"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 5,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 3:24 am
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the plan, and Gray appealed to the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:36 pm
A divided Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld the Northern District of California’s certification of a nationwide class of over 1.5 million current and former female employees who sued for alleged gender discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:44 am
County of Merced, the California Court of Appeal for the Fifth District held that the Merced County Planning Commission violated the Brown Act by adopting a CEQA mitigated negative declaration without specifically noticing it on the Commission’s agenda. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
” We’ll see how things turn out, but color me skeptical the Circuit would think that a winning argument if it came up on appeal again. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:27 am
THE STATE OF WYOMING Docket Number: S-12-0185URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspxAppeal from the District Court of Sweetwater County, Honorable Jere A. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:48 am
The County Court at Law (“CCL”) denied the company’s motion for arbitration and RSL funding filed an interlocutory appeal with the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas. [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:11 am
The Fifth District stated:The party seeking to invoke the court’s jurisdiction has the burden to prove the validity of service of process. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:55 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacated the district court’s order and remanded the case. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:55 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacated the district court’s order and remanded the case. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 11:25 am
Instead, the court reasoned that Steadfast, whose policy limits reached $30 million, was liable for 3/5ths of the defense costs, whereas Greenwich, whose policy covered $20 million, was liable for 2/5ths. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:18 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which on May 11 issued a one-sentence order that lifted Pittman’s injunction, allowing the state to enforce the law. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 12:05 pm
, No. 16-30528, 2018 WL 4844687 (5th Cir. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:21 am
Texas basically started the medical provider network trend and there are many states that have modeled their systems, albeit with notable differences, on the Texas network style.But a recent case out of the 5th District Court of Appeals in Texas may alarm physicians and other medical providers in networks, because in private contractual settings a doctor is not free to express his opinion, and certainly not in his chart notes, nor encourage patients to take legal… [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:56 pm
Miss. 2007), appeal dismissed for technical reasons, 585 F.3d 855 (5th Cir. 2009); Whether a court-imposed emissions cap requires policy decisions that are not within the proper province of the courts; and Whether the Second Circuit’s decision represents an unwarranted extension of the Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:05 am
Last week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
Dep't of Transportation, 985 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008), the Fifth District court of appeals did not agree. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Ultimately, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals granted Murphy Oil’s petition and held that the company “did not commit unfair labor practices by requiring employees to sign its arbitration agreement or seeking to enforce that agreement in federal district court. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:23 am
, No. 07-50609 (5th Cir. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:23 am
, No. 07-50609 (5th Cir. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
Fannin County District Judge Laurine Blake erred, said the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, when she allowed defendant Vaughn Bell, accused of drug possession, to be shackled in her courtroom during trial without providing any justification except that, "Everybody who is in custody has the same necessity of restraint." [read post]
