Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 4,086
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Starbucks' NOW logoIn this appeal to the Supreme Court, Starbucks (HK), who are broadcasters and not baristas, dropped a claim for infringement of a CTM for a device mark dominated by the word "NOW" with minimal graphical embellishment which was ultimately held invalid. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:09 pm
United States 5. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
More generally, in the Verizon v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as licensing Roberts v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:07 pm
In Department of Transportation v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
The Feres doctrine, stemming from the 1950 Feres v. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 8:07 pm
Supreme Court stated in its landmark decision in Moody v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 9:20 am
V. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
Thomas McCarthy's seminal treatise on trademark law states his "who are you, what are you" test. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
News Libel reform continues to dominate the media law news this week. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 11:42 am
For example, this past summer when the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in the Dobbs case, reversing Roe v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
” The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 6:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm
The public is, as usual, left in a state of misinformed confusion. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
In Wyeth v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:21 am
Young v. [read post]
