Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 2201 - 2220 of 6,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2018, 5:28 am by SHG
That United States District Judge Paula Xinis included this paragraph in her recitation of “facts” is the first hint. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 2:24 am by Michael Lowe
§ 2260- Production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am by Barry Sookman
Canada’s major trading partners including the United States and the European Union recognize that net neutrality rules do not prevent courts or government agencies from ordering the removal of illegal content from the Internet. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Bob Bauer
A case in point are the attacks during the investigation of President Bill Clinton on the Special Division of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, accused of partisan mischief replacing of Robert Fiske with Ken Starr. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Raphael Murillo
Although inspections are a remarkably recent development in the United States, they have a history that long predates the expansive regulatory state within which they now exist and the often-technical function they serve. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Adam Feldman
United States, Merit Management Group v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1334(a) and (b) and the Standing Order of Reference entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 5:56 am by Alyson Drake
She argued several times successfully to the all-male Supreme Court of the United States and her successes as a whole discouraged legislatures from treating women and men differently. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States; and (2) whether reasonable jurists can debate whether Florida attempted first-degree murd [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:39 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, which interprets a clause in the Internal Revenue Code and holds that to convict a defendant under the “Omnibus Clause,” the government must prove the defendant was aware of a pending tax-related proceeding, such as an investigation or audit, or could foresee such a proceeding. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:35 pm by Anthony Gaughan
In the 2015 case of Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]