Search for: "Doctor v. State"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 8,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2024, 8:10 am
Cal.). in Loggins v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:10 pm
There is usually 'no better evidence of the state of one’s health” than the medical opinions from the patient’s current treating doctor.' (Gunn v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:42 am
In Franklin-Mansuo v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 pm
"Schaar v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 12:37 pm
The Second District's opinion stated: In moving for a directed verdict, the hospital and ER doctor argued that the Coxes failed to prove that Mr. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 5:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
The underlying case was Rowatt v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:12 am
In an October 2013 decision, New York’s highest state court in Romanello v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 11:15 am
After last year’s Supreme Court decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Ramirez v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:38 pm
Surprisingly, but thankfully, the New England Journal of Medicine felt so strongly about the effort to shield pharmaceutical medical device manufacturers from liability, they filed an unsolicited brief with the United States Supreme Court in a case called Wyeth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
That argument was rejected citing the case of the United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 7:23 am
” Gaudette v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:33 pm
Also, in Lightfoot v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
Jan. 24, 2008) (holding plaintiff was not collaterally estopped from pursuing claim against the State in the Claims Commission where a federal court jury in a separate federal court action against other defendants found no fault on part of State-employed doctor on verdict form because the issue of that doctor’s fault was not actually litigated in federal court action nor did the plaintiff have full and fair opportunity in federal court action to litigate the… [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:17 am
CAS moved to exclude all witnesses as failing to meet the legal requirements to give scientific testimony under State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am
This can be traced back to the outcome of Pliva, Inc. v Mensing in 2011. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:30 am
Doctors, therefore, cannot assess such risk with any certainty and medical bodies cannot issue appropriate guidelines. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:50 am
" In a recent Louisiana Court of Appeals Case, Amos v. [read post]
