Search for: "Doe 103"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 3,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Contrary to common wisdom, federal law does not impose a legal duty on large employers to offer their employees access to a health insurance plan, or to subsidize such a plan. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:41 am
Dobrev does not prove that the mother prevented him from seeing his children.... [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
As originality and access had been admitted by the defendant himself, the Court was easily convinced that these two requirements were met (para 103). [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Does that potentially make them manufacturers? [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 12:10 pm
Jennings, 69 NY2d 103, 115 (1986). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Can this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm
Lee, 720 F.3d 96, 103 (2d Cir. 2013) The risk must be more than the trauma associated with uprooting and moving the child back to the country of habitual residence. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:38 pm
[…] When such situations arise, the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting ensures that a particular invention (and obvious variants thereof) does not receive an undue patent term extension. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
(pp. 103-08). [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
The Reasoning of the Examining Division4.1 Although the applicant had filed a request for a postponement of oral proceedings, and this request was not subsequently withdrawn, the section of the contested decision entitled "Reasons for the decision" does not include any indication why this request was refused. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:00 am
[103] It is during this demonstration that Roy links the two halves of her novel. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
On July 5, 2011, the Examining Division (ED) posted a communication under R 71(3) EPC, informing the applicant that the main request on file did not comply with A 84 but that it intended to grant a patent on the basis of the first auxiliary request (with claim 9 amended by the ED).On November 4, 2011, the applicant filed electronically a letter which reads as follows:“In response to the Communication under R 71(3) dated 5 July 2011, we enclose French and German translations of the claims. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
As originality and access had been admitted by the defendant himself, the Court was easily convinced that these two requirements were met (para 103). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm
"[T]he prior restraint doctrine does play a role in evaluating the regulation of commercial speech. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:35 pm
For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the GCSPA does not authorize an award of punitive damages. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
The Reasoning of the Examining Division4.1 Although the applicant had filed a request for a postponement of oral proceedings, and this request was not subsequently withdrawn, the section of the contested decision entitled "Reasons for the decision" does not include any indication why this request was refused. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Doe 112 II. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
It does not, in our respectful opinion, provide a workable constitutional standard. [read post]
