Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 2201 - 2220 of 8,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2020, 3:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm by William Ford, Tia Sewell
We’re a small and flexible team where everyone does a little bit of everything, but your primary job on a daily basis will be conducting research and policy advocacy at the intersection of technology, data protection, and equity. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
  Nicklin J found that “the defendant clearly considers that he is above the law; that he does not need to comply with orders of the court. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 5:06 pm by Chris Castle
This is good, and is another example of how BMG is setting the gold standard for courageously defending their writers.. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:33 pm by Sami Azhari
Defendants with a single prior felony drug conviction: face a minimum of 20 years in prison (life imprisonment if death or serious bodily injury occurs) and fines up to $8 million for individual defendants. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:49 pm by Andrew Hamm
Milliman Inc. 20-249Issues: (1) Whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts the generally applicable disavowal defense codified in Iowa’s Liquidation Act; and (2) whether, if so, whether the McCarran-Ferguson Act exempts the disavowal defense from preemption. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:04 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Applying a multi-factor test, the Court found that the amended complaint pleads factual allegations that, if proven, “would establish that Plaintiffs’ work and business operations were subject to substantial control by Defendants,” and constitute a “colorable prima facie demonstration that they are Goya employees. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
Where (as happened here) the State does not object, the Court of Appeals may exercise jurisdiction by granting the petitions for writ of certiorari. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am by Florian Mueller
Goldstein tried nonetheless (as the alternative would have been to just concede the case away, though that would have been warranted) to defend the retroactive approach, and pointed to Baker v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:04 pm by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
R Street does not discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, era of military service, gender identity, relationship structure or anything else that's illegal, immoral or nonsensical to use as a basis for hiring. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 04453 (2d Dept.,2020) the parties were married on January 20, 1996. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
White 20-240Issue: Whether a capital defendant can waive a claim of intellectual disability under Atkins v. [read post]