Search for: "Doe VI" Results 2201 - 2220 of 5,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2014, 6:26 am by Marty Lederman
  But that does not mean that they are subject to substantial pressure to do so, let alone substantial pressure imposed by federal law--it might, on the whole, be a modest or tentative or ambivalent preference. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:45 am by Roel van Woudenberg
If the Board does allow the first and the second, bad, translations into the proceedings, can they be used in full? [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm by Marty Lederman
  The law does not require that the employer host the disfavored speech; it also allows the employer to simply cease providing employee access to the bulletin board--something the employer would not have "freely chosen" to do, based on magnanimity, or a desire for good employee relations, or what have you. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
"The IPKat does not propose to answer these questions or even second-guess them. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 4:55 pm
Originalism should be no different.In Part VI, I focus on Judge Wilkinson's more nuanced critique of Heller. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm by Armand Grinstajn
However, this result does not necessarily imply the above mentioned negative feature. [2.2.6] This negative feature therefore adds subject-matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:52 am by Doug Cornelius
§ 1.7704-1(j) provides for interests in a partnership to be deemed not readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof if the sum of the percentage interests in partnership capital or profits transferred during the taxable year of the partnership does not exceed 2 percent of the total interests in partnership capital or profits. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 4:23 am by SHG
And what does the once and present DoE chief civil rights bureaucrat have to say about it? [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm by Charlie Dunlap
In a footnote, the DoD Manual does quote from the Koh speech to further amplify how the U.S. would decide if a particular cyber event constituted a use of force. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:15 pm
Thus the meat of the claims are of a method, though the claim is of an apparatus, which is a transgression of §112 ¶2, indefiniteness, for mixed claim types, vis-à-vis IPXL v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:35 am
He actually wanted greater pension and health insurance leverage vis-a-vis his police and firefighters, although those unions are specifically exempted from Act 10 reforms. [read post]