Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 5,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
If a work of art doesn’t meet all three of these requirements, then it does not qualify for copyright protection. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 12:04 am
Pitt has a weak offense, so this does not bide well for Panthers. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:22 am
If anyone other than the holder of copyright in a certain work supplies a clickable link to the work on his website, does that constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society? [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 5:38 pm
1. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:51 am
’While the term `sexual conduct’ is not defined in N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4, it is well-recognized that the statute does not require direct sexual contact. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 1:21 am
Although the judge considered that on the evidence the third version had been copied, the level of copying was not sufficient for a finding of infringement [128].FlagrancyThe emails between Bluecrest and Express sealed their fate on flagrancy (see paras 38 and 39, for example). [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[1]United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
The theorem proposes that, absent transaction costs, property will be allocated efficiently regardless of initial entitlement.[1] Widespread acceptance of this assertion has given rise to much legal analysis aimed at reducing transaction costs in order to lubricate bargaining and achieve efficient allocation of property rights. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:41 pm
So what does one do? [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Doe, 404 U.S. 987, 92 S.Ct. 537, 30 L.Ed.2d 539; Doe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Doe, 404 U.S. 987, 92 S.Ct. 537, 30 L.Ed.2d 539; Doe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:42 pm
Part 1 of our thoughts about Tenant Allowances promised that this installment would cover two issues, the first of which was “how does the payment of a tenant allowance affect tax obligation. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Article 39 of the Constitution makes no express reference to the Preamble to the Constitution. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 6:54 pm
There was no agreement protecting our forces after May 1. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:30 am
Employers Are Not Authorized to Require that Employees Exhaust Leave for Reasons 1 through 7 before Using Leave for Reason 8 The bill does not require that employees exhaust SPSL for reasons 1 through 7 before the employee uses SPSL for reason 8.[27] 4. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Petitioner was granted tenure in the mathematics tenure area, effective September 1, 2006. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Petitioner was granted tenure in the mathematics tenure area, effective September 1, 2006. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Petitioner was granted tenure in the mathematics tenure area, effective September 1, 2006. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Petitioner was granted tenure in the mathematics tenure area, effective September 1, 2006. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:28 pm
39; McIsaac v. [read post]
